5 ms·

Honestly it's the first place I look when I must implement some network protocol.

• jowea 1y ago
  Yeah, lots of the weaker parts of Wikipedia relate either to political controversy or things that the editor base doesn't care as much about.
• mschuster91 1y ago
  yup. the amount of times I have looked up how to send an email over raw SMTP for troubleshooting...
  • mdp2021 1y ago
    ...And on the contrary, I got deliria from an LLM in a similar area just hours ago. This probably highlights how human contribution or automated referencing both have a root in the sources, that should be recovered as a focus. Part of the future of the presentation of information should be hyperlinking "to the book pages".
• freedomben 1y ago
  Network protocol stuff on Wikipedia has been top notch and my go-to since at least 2010. It really is highly underrated for that. I had to implement a layer 7 protocol on top of UDP back in the day, and it required a lot of understanding/fiddling with UDP and IP packet details to get it working right, and even required some router config (IP fragmentation became a huge problem, gotta love protocols designed by committee D-:)