4 ms·

I'm a long time vim user, but neovim with plugins is just not worth it for me. Something always breaks. I think neovim would do better if they started integrati

I'm a long time vim user, but neovim with plugins is just not worth it for me. Something always breaks. I think neovim would do better if they started integrating the core plugins like LSP, tree sitter

normie3000 1y ago
Same, but I'm guessing it'll settle down in the next 5-10 years.
lawn 1y ago
> I think neovim would do better if they started integrating the core plugins like LSP, tree sitter That's exactly what they're doing. Both tree-sitter and LSP are built in and the primary LSP/tree-sitter plugins only bundle default LSP configurations and tree-sitter queries respectively. They're also planning to include tree-sitter query bundling into Neovim natively somehow, to make it even less reliant on the nvim-treesitter plugin. They recently simplified the LSP configuration and to configure a new LSP you basically do this: vim.lsp.config("expert", { cmd = { "expert" }, root_markers = { "mix.exs", ".git" }, filetypes = { "elixir", "eelixir", "heex" }, }) vim.lsp.enable("expert") And then in the "LspAttach" autocmd you can define your LSP specific keymaps for example.
- GCUMstlyHarmls 1y ago
  > And then in the "LspAttach" autocmd you can define your LSP specific keymaps for example. If you want. It also now ships with most auto-mapped.
deleted 1y ago
[deleted]
cassepipe 1y ago
I was the same and kept using vim for C/C++ development. vim-plug, gutentags (ctags manager), ALE did their job pretty well and I didn't bother to learn another way. All that changed with web dev where you have to juggle with different syntaxes and tools... I decided I would just use a neovim distribution. I have tried many but Lunarvim (now inactive) and now Astronvim have served me well so far.