> The article is one person recording their own use of AI It's not ONE person. I agree that it's not "every single human being" either, but more of a prelimina

> The article is one person recording their own use of AI It's not ONE person. I agree that it's not "every single human being" either, but more of a preliminary result, but I don't understand why you discount results you dislike. I thought you were completely rational? https://www.theregister.com/2025/07/11/ai_code_tools_slow_down/ https://www.theregister.com/2025/07/11/ai_code_tools_slow_do...