> Github Copilot themselves say that initially, users only accept 29% of prompted coding suggestions (which itself is a wild claim to inefficiency, why would yo

> Github Copilot themselves say that initially, users only accept 29% of prompted coding suggestions (which itself is a wild claim to inefficiency, why would you publicize that?), but with six months of experience, users naturally get better at prompting and that grows to a whopping 34% acceptance rate. Apparently, 6 months of experience only makes you 5% better at prompting. Or, alternatively, exposure to our robot overlords makes you less discerning, less concerned with, ah, whether the thing is correct or not. (This _definitely_ seems to be a thing with LLM text generation, with many people seemingly not even reading the output before they post it, and I assume it's at least somewhat a thing for software as well.)