4 ms·
Of course not, because that would be annoying and unwieldy. On the other hand, you can add expansive dictionaries for every language to an ereader for the low,
by squigz 1y ago
Of course not, because that would be annoying and unwieldy. On the other hand, you can add expansive dictionaries for every language to an ereader for the low, low weight of... nothing at all.
I suspect if you compare the usage of dictionaries among paper book readers vs ereader users, the latter use them more often - probably at least partially because they're so much easier to use. I suspect the incidence of not understanding a word would be pretty much the same.
For myself, I read a lot of older books with archaic and niche terms, so it's practically required to be able to look things up if I want to really understand what's going on.
(As an aside, I looked up a definition on Google just writing this to ensure I was using a word properly. :P)
- loughnane 1y agoI get that. I also read many old books. Usually I can get context out of the sentence itself, but i'll occasionally bust out my phone. I see why it's nice, I just don't see why it's a top-tier feature. Each their own of course. I can imagine if I was looking up 2-10x as many words as I am now then the convenience would indeed be much more important.