3 ms·
Actually, you are wrong. Libyans overwhelmingly supported the revolution. My family, friends and family friends are from Libya I just spent a month there this
by mulligan 14y ago
Actually, you are wrong.
Libyans overwhelmingly supported the revolution. My family, friends and family friends are from Libya I just spent a month there this past summer.
These actions have been pretty clearly condemned by Libyans and don't represent the whole country.
But nice try flogging your conspiracy theory.
- toyg 14y agoYeah, and after 1945 all Italians had been "resistance fighters", of course; saying otherwise would have put your life in danger. Every revolution has its special tribunals. I suspect, 10 years from now, the well-educated youth who grew up in secularist and nationalist Arab regimes, will think they made a big mistake when they toppled them. Like Coptic Christians who badmouthed Mubarak in Egypt, they didn't know how good they really had it.
- stfu 14y agoThe only way to make sense of this is by taken a super long term perspective. I can see some point, that with a lot of luck one of the next generations might become more tamed down. At least I honestly can't make any other sense of this "yeah, so we removed the dictator, now do whatever you want" approach.
- jahmed 14y agoYou don't 'have it good' if you depend on the government oppressing, torturing and disappearing others.
- toyg 14y agoIf the alternative is oppressing, torturing and disappearing YOU, I'd argue you have it quite good indeed. EDIT: to clarify, I'm not saying that murderous dictators are a good thing. What I'm saying is that, by toppling them with all-out revolutions, they've probably thrown the baby out with the bathwater, because they've discredited the whole nationalist/secularist argument. Considering Qadafi and Mubarak were getting very old, it would have been much better to negotiate a gradual transition to parliamentary rule, like they've had in Spain or Chile.