3 ms·
> But 99% of the Android's user base doesn't want to sideload (and they shouldn't). Never say never. It's a matter of principle - giving in an inch can and wil
by bigbadfeline 1y ago
> But 99% of the Android's user base doesn't want to sideload (and they shouldn't).
Never say never. It's a matter of principle - giving in an inch can and will get your head chewed up. As in "I am altering the deal, pray I don't alter it any further" [1]
> I think you do not understand how alternative OSes work, because this is plain wrong.
I do. With proper pressure Google can stop manufacturers from dragging their feet. Say if Android required an unlocked bootloader and a standard API BSP.
> I don't like monopolies.
And they aren't going to de-monopolize themselves. [2]
[1] Darth Android
https://pluralistic.net/2025/09/01/fulu/#i-am-altering-the-deal https://pluralistic.net/2025/09/01/fulu/#i-am-altering-the-d...
[2] They brick you because they can
https://pluralistic.net/2024/05/24/record-scratch/#autoenshittification https://pluralistic.net/2024/05/24/record-scratch/#autoenshi...
- palata 1y ago> It's a matter of principle My principle is that I fight for things that bring something, not for the sake of fighting :-). > I do. With proper pressure Google can stop manufacturers from dragging their feet. Say if Android required an unlocked bootloader and a standard API BSP. I don't follow. How would having an unlocked bootloader prevent alternative OSes?