2 ms·
$10,000 in production costs, $4,990,000 million in post-production security. I watched a 13m51s 'trailer' that was linked from one of the NYTimes stories. It's
by gojomo 14y ago
$10,000 in production costs, $4,990,000 million in post-production security.
I watched a 13m51s 'trailer' that was linked from one of the NYTimes stories. It's hilariously awful, and further: some of the most-likely-to-offend, specifically anti-Muhammad/anti-Islam lines are clumsily dubbed in with different voices than the main actors.
Thus I suspect there's a chance that even the actors didn't know completely how their performances would be used: they might have thought it was some other period drama, that then via redubbing it had its offensiveness "turned up to 11".
- eslachance 14y agoYour suspicion turned out to be correct. At least one of the actresses in the movie spoke out about the fact that they were actually cast for "Desert Warrior", a movie with absolutely nothing to do with Muhammad. They never even spoke the name! Everything was, as we can clearly see, dubbed in post-production. At least one source: http://www.cnn.com/2012/09/12/world/anti-islam-film/index.html http://www.cnn.com/2012/09/12/world/anti-islam-film/index.ht...