> That's a long response that boils down to whatabout-ism. When someone's saying "X is destroying Y!" and you point out that A and B have at least as much culp

> That's a long response that boils down to whatabout-ism. When someone's saying "X is destroying Y!" and you point out that A and B have at least as much culpability for whatever is happening to Y as X does, that's not whataboutism. It's accurate assignment of blame.