9 ms·
> Each time you convey a covered work You didn't convey a covered work by using it to respond to a response or anywhere else in my hypothetical - and indeed th
by gpm 1y ago
> Each time you convey a covered work
You didn't convey a covered work by using it to respond to a response or anywhere else in my hypothetical - and indeed that part of the license exactly matches the GPLv3. The relevant portion of the license is rather
> Notwithstanding any other provision of this License, if you modify the Program, your modified version must prominently offer all users interacting with it remotely through a computer network (if your version supports such interaction) an opportunity to receive the Corresponding Source of your version by providing access to the Corresponding Source from a network server at no charge, through some standard or customary means of facilitating copying of software. This Corresponding Source shall include the Corresponding Source for any work covered by version 3 of the GNU General Public License that is incorporated pursuant to the following paragraph.
- shakna 1y agoSo... You know a proxy is not legal... But felt the need to make me explain which facets it would cover...? Yeah, I'm not continuing this convetsation.
- gpm 1y agoI know nothing of the sort. I know what section of the license is relevant to network requests, why the section of license you cited is not, and that a proxy stripping offers of source does not seem to violate the text (though it certainly violates the spirit) of the license. I do not know how a court would react to such an attempt. I agree that I'm done with this conversation though.