There is significant evidence for (1), although the two aren't mutually inconsistent: – There is evidence that there is a quota on arrests, [1], rather than de

There is significant evidence for (1), although the two aren't mutually inconsistent: – There is evidence that there is a quota on arrests, [1], rather than deportations, although the administration has inconsistently denied that quotas exist (because it would help legal cases against their strategies.) [2] [1] https://www.reuters.com/world/us/ices-tactics-draw-criticism-it-triples-daily-arrest-targets-2025-06-10/ https://www.reuters.com/world/us/ices-tactics-draw-criticism... [2] https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/aug/03/trump-administration-daily-quota-immigration-arrests https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/aug/03/trump-admini... – Therefore, there have been incidents, especially in targeted cities like LA, where citizens [1] and lawful permanent residents have arrested before being released after multiple days of detention [2], although this data is not systematically gathered, e.g.: [1] https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2025-08-08/how-many-citizens-have-been-arrested-in-immigration-crackdown https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2025-08-08/how-many... [2] https://www.newsweek.com/jemmy-jimenez-rosa-immigration-detainment-2120389 https://www.newsweek.com/jemmy-jimenez-rosa-immigration-deta... – Recourse to the courts in a meaningful, practical way is ineffective. The administration has ignored lawsuits where judges have issued injunctions against ICE dragnets due to plausible evidence that ICE dragnets target individuals who look Latin American, e.g.: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/aug/06/ice-border-patrol-home-depot-los-angeles https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/aug/06/ice-border-p... The suspicion (although I need to look up a legal source) is that the administration intends to drag on legal cases as long as possible through appeals, perhaps even up to the Supreme Court, which will take months.