3 ms·
I understand what you are saying here, but many voices -- some from below, some from above -- use this argument to justify the abandonment of standards: first p
by FrankWilhoit 1y ago
I understand what you are saying here, but many voices -- some from below, some from above -- use this argument to justify the abandonment of standards: first particular standards, then standards in general. Any relief they gain thereby is transitory and yields to greater misery, of a kind that is not anticipatory but immediate.
- forkit 1y agoThis was a more philosophical thought rather than particular case. I am not sure if I understood your comment, do you mind elaborating ?
- FrankWilhoit 1y agoEach one says, The Enemy is ___________: a faction, or a propaganda, or an ethnicity, or a technology, or piles of garbage next the road. My reply is in every case the same: The Enemy is "LOL nothing matters".
- forkit 1y agoIf one understood nothing matters not just logically but as an intrinsic truth then well “nothing truly matters”.
- FrankWilhoit 1y agoIn practice it simply forbids ever saying that anything is not good enough.