>Step one would be getting an someone independent, ideally with some journalistic integrity That's already part of the problem. Who defines what integrity is?

>Step one would be getting an someone independent, ideally with some journalistic integrity That's already part of the problem. Who defines what integrity is? How do you measure it? And even if you come up with something, how do you convince everyone to agree on it? One person's most trusted source will always be just another bought spindoctor to the next. I don't think this problem is salvageable anymore. I think we need to consider the possibility that the internet will die as a source for any objective information.