4 ms·

>I to assume it was yourself who just walked through flagging a run of comments that don't violate guidelines? You could make that assumption, but you'd be wro

>I to assume it was yourself who just walked through flagging a run of comments that don't violate guidelines? You could make that assumption, but you'd be wrong. I haven't flagged any of your comments. I suppose I could flag this one as complaining about downvotes/flags does violate HN guidelines. But I won't. Especially as "flagging" comments or submissions should be limited to spammy and/or low-quality entries. I disagree with your comments being flagged (or even downvoted, for that matter), as that stifles discussion. And more's the pity. Edit: Unfortunately, it's too late for me to "vouch" for your comments. But I would if I could.

defrost 1y ago
I don't much care about the flagging either way; it's more I only noticed you replied when I saw my top level comment in this old discussion had changed state (HN makes it hard to follow old discussion threads, I don't have any custom tooling to highlight replies, just a habit of mostly circling back every few days). > I suppose I could flag this one as complaining about downvotes/flags does violate HN guidelines. You'd be hard pressed to justify on those claimed grounds; noticing a comment has been flagged is _not_ equivalent to complaining about a comment being flagged .. after more than ten years here it amuses me more than anything. Again, you've sidestepped any comment with substance re: the original question of bigotry which you posed and I've addressed .. If you'd like to address that or ask any more actual questions (rather than intuitive leaps of essentially incorrect judgement) I'm open to continuing here (tomorrow or the next day).