Ha I did. But only because, your arguments only make sense if it's not really required, or if it's implemented so poorly as to be effectively not required. I d

Ha I did. But only because, your arguments only make sense if it's not really required, or if it's implemented so poorly as to be effectively not required. I don't see the point of criticizing a policy idea with an argument like "it will be implemented badly so it will be bad". Like, obviously, yes, if you do it badly it will be bad. That applies to anything, including the status quo.