3 ms·
I think @chaps was quite justified in defining "mention", given that you just talked about 10/7 and then immediately insisted you never mentioned 10/7. That sug
by konmok 1y ago
I think @chaps was quite justified in defining "mention", given that you just talked about 10/7 and then immediately insisted you never mentioned 10/7. That suggests that you either don't know what "mention" means, or you don't take any care with your words. And if you aren't being careful with your words, why should we trust them?
- richardfeynman 1y agoYes, of course you think that, but it's also rather silly. I said "prior to 10/7", to point out that people claimed there was an open-air prison before that date. I wasn't talking about the attacks; I was talking about before the attacks. Do you want me to define "prior" for you?
- chaps 1y agoI think your anger is clouding your interpretation of words and intent of words. Chill, friend.
- richardfeynman 1y agoI'm not angry.
- breppp 1y agoReading this thread comes as if you are engaging in some overly polite mode of trolling