3 ms·
Like literally anything, it will depend upon how much your code does, what libraries it uses and so on, but here's a trivial little example to at least dispell
by cb321 1y ago
Like literally anything, it will depend upon how much your code does, what libraries it uses and so on, but here's a trivial little example to at least dispell a worry of multi-megabyte outputs for trivial things:
echo echo 1 > j.nim
nim js j.nim
node j.js
>>> see 1\\n <<<<
ls -l j.js
>>> 36636 Sep 1 12:54 j.js <<<
nim js -d:release j.nim
ls -l j.js
>>> 11369 Sep 1 12:56 j.js <<<
So, with -d:release stripping away a lot of debugging logic, it's not so bad. Even with d:release there is probably ~50% of the text of that j.js that is just C comments which could be trivially stripped away. E.g., cpp<j.js|wc -c gives 6350 for that very same 11369 file. There are js minification things one could also run on the output. People do complain about this, but people complain a lot. It's probably not so uncompetitive for less trivial programs that do a little bit more work, both minified, apples-to-apples care & all that.
- banashark 1y agoGood to know. My references are typescript, fable, and cljs for “what does it generally look like bundle-size wise, what can I expect as I add more libraries/functionality, etc