4 ms·
That's fine, then you just have to deal with ads, 'sponsored results' and the AI spam. And the tracking, if you care about that.
by boesboes 1y ago
That's fine, then you just have to deal with ads, 'sponsored results' and the AI spam. And the tracking, if you care about that.
- Milpotel 1y agoAs if adblockers/browser extensions wouldn't deal with those (minus the tracking)...
- layer8 1y agoYou don’t have to deal with that when using a suitable ad blocker.
- const_cast 1y ago... For now, and only partially. I'm not aware of any AI blocker that exists. Not to mention Google Chrome doesn't even allow full fat ad blockers.
- therealpygon 1y ago> Google Chrome That would be an awfully weird browser choice after all the privacy/ad-blocking talk.
- const_cast 1y ago... or chromium. There's only one viable option, and it's firefox and derivatives. Some tech people haven't figured this out yet, forgive me if I assumed wrong. This is, after all, in a conversation about using Google Search.
- pants2 1y agoYou're still dealing with the fact that Google ranks results based partly on ad-revenue, so even if you're blocking the ads you're getting routed to spammier sites.
- SEOCurmudgeon 1y agoLink! Jeez, this is blatantly false.