Was about to write roughly the same. But it's much more than that I think: when the stuff you sell to the other side can easily be substituted, from another su

Was about to write roughly the same. But it's much more than that I think: when the stuff you sell to the other side can easily be substituted, from another supplier, domestically or by changing to ways that get by without, where's the benefit of stopping trade? Those 0.5% the other supplier has been more expensive (if it even is, might very well have just been inertia keeping them buying from you) won't meaningfully harm their war effort.