> [1] There technically is a way to do this That's what I've described? > rebase -i, carefully editing the interactive instructions You neither need to use i

> [1] There technically is a way to do this That's what I've described? > rebase -i, carefully editing the interactive instructions You neither need to use interactive rebase nor carefully edit, since there is rebase --onto. > But it's too hard to do in practice, and far too easy to get wrong. I do this often it's not more complicated then any other rebase. What is annoying in Git is rebaseing across multiple merges while forging committer and date information. Can JJ do that better?