4 ms·
Are you referring to communism? Because that was all about central control - the exact opposite. It was about as cooperative as countries with "democratic" in n
by martin-t 1y ago
Are you referring to communism? Because that was all about central control - the exact opposite. It was about as cooperative as countries with "democratic" in name are actually democratic.
Don't let a bad implementation ruin a good idea. Instead, look at what specific ways the implementation fails to learn for next time.
- whobre 1y ago> Don't let a bad implementation ruin a good idea. It would certainly help to see at least one good implementation of the “good idea”
- martin-t 1y agoWorker cooperatives: - A bunch of examples here: https://old.reddit.com/r/cooperatives/comments/p23rxr/what_are_some_of_the_most_successful_worker/ https://old.reddit.com/r/cooperatives/comments/p23rxr/what_a... - Some more: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_ownership https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_ownership - Oxide computer company - idk how exactly the ownership works but AFAIK all workers except sales have the same salary. - The early idSoftware AFAIK worked similarly with all 4 core gamedevs getting paid the same Note that nothing says everyone has to get paid the same, it just ends up happening in some examples.
- CactusBlue 1y agoI'd say Oxide is the exact opposite, in that they have the same base salary but they vary compensation by adjustment of equity