> Btrfs is NOT constantly eating people data. You have nothing to back this statement. Constantly may be a strong word, but there is a long line of people shar

> Btrfs is NOT constantly eating people data. You have nothing to back this statement. Constantly may be a strong word, but there is a long line of people sharing tales of woe. It's good that it works for you, but that's not a universal experience. > It's widely used and the default filesystem of several distributions. As a former user, that's horrifying. > Most of the problems are like for the other filesystem: caused by the hardware. The whole point of btrfs over (say) ext4 is that it's supposed to hold up when things don't work.