> if he wasn’t then he would be fine with removing it Mmm... what? He talks about music. It would be hard to do lectures about paintings, or architecture, with

> if he wasn’t then he would be fine with removing it Mmm... what? He talks about music. It would be hard to do lectures about paintings, or architecture, without showing anything. How can he demonstrate what he's talking about if he can't play even a very short excerpt of the piece he's commenting?