3 ms·
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1871402125000955 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S18714... Survey took 15 years, a
by sixtyj 1y ago
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1871402125000955 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S18714...
Survey took 15 years, and 19,831 participants. Median follow-up was 8.1 years. Further research is required.
Methods
Adult participants who reported usual intake from two valid 24-h dietary recalls were included from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in 2003–2018 (n = 19,831). Mortality status as of December 2019 was obtained through linkage to the National Death Index. Average eating duration was categorized as <8, 8–<10, 10–<12, 12–14 h (mean duration), >14–16, and >16 h. Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were derived.
Results
During a median follow-up of 8.1 years, compared with eating duration of 12–14 h, eating duration <8 h was robustly associated with higher cardiovascular mortality (HR, 2.35 [95 % CI, 1.39–3.98]), but not with all-cause and cancer mortality. The positive association with cardiovascular mortality remained consistent across 8 subgroups stratified by race/ethnicity, socioeconomic factors, and smoking status, and survived 14 sensitivity analyses. However, the association with all-cause mortality did not survive many sensitivity analyses.
Conclusions
Although a positive association was observed between eating duration <8 h and cardiovascular mortality, further research is required to understand whether this risk is attributed to the short eating duration itself or residual confounding resulting from its contributing factors.
- munch117 1y ago15 years ago, was intermittent fasting even a thing back then? I wonder how many of the people eating within an 8 hour window didn't do it because of a diet, but instead because of an eating disorder or some other disease.
- woleium 1y agoAnecdotally, yes, i was doing it and there was a bunch of stuff online
- port11 1y agoYours should be the top-most comment. This is another reminder that, in the short term, a lot of research about health amounts to very little signal because the confounding factors are so varied. We can, of course, learn a lot about health very quickly, but much of the reporting is sensationalised nonsense.
- woleium 1y agofor example, folks who are doing if are probably overweight and at higher risk than the baseline already. I didn’t see this controlled anywhere
- port11 1y agoMaybe. I did IF for 6 years simply for the healthy aging claims, despite being fairly active and fit. Is it really a weight loss thing?