3 ms·
TNG was produced in the eighties and set centuries into the future. Given the technology, budget, and foresight available at the time, what they produced did su
by estimator7292 1y ago
TNG was produced in the eighties and set centuries into the future. Given the technology, budget, and foresight available at the time, what they produced did sufficiently convey "future spaceship" in a way that was comfortable and relatable to (then) contemporary audiences.
TNG is one of the most tastefully done, IMO. The Expanse is only good because it's set in the immediate future with technology only slightly more advanced than today. But also the technology, materials, and SciFi corpus is so advanced now that it's just as easy to create an extremely convincing 2050's set as it is a 3050's set. Today's space opera is so incredibly egregious. What is the ratio of lens flares in a single modern trek movie compared to all 20th century trek? The Expanse definitely suffers from this kind of overproduction when you look closer, but because it's so close into the future we tend to overlook a lot.
ST: Enterprise did this extremely well, IMO, and for the same reason as The Expanse. It's in the immediate future and built around contemporary technology. Personally I adore the horrendous passive matrix LCDs everywhere in that show. It just adds to the scrappiness of Earth's first exploration ship.
- yencabulator 1y agoExpanse really loved set pieces designed to be stood around. In vehicles that are regularly 0g! That big waist-high horizontal touchpanel is going to very hard to use when you have nowhere to anchor yourself. And accidentally bumping into it while floating through has got to be annoying.
- Kye 1y agoThat's where the magnetic boots came in.
- yencabulator 1y agoWhat proud Belter would want to clank around like a Tumang? The boots make some sense outside the ship, when you could drift off. Inside the ship, they're mostly about the TV show budget.