3 ms·
> The only way that makes any sense is if you subtract returns for sales made in a different period to the sales period you are considering Exactly. That's the
by msgilligan 1y ago
> The only way that makes any sense is if you subtract returns for sales made in a different period to the sales period you are considering
Exactly. That's the way accounting works. They did not know in the previous quarter that the product would be returned in the following quarter, so they end up having negative sales in the current quarter.
Yes it produces "garbage output", which I find amusing.
- oncallthrow 1y agoBut that isn’t how you calculate market share, so what you’re saying is nonsense.
- msgilligan 1y agoThat is how it was calculated in a published trade magazine (either Infoworld or MacWeek, I think) I'm not sure if the the analysis was done by a market research firm or the magazine.
- oncallthrow 1y agoPresumably by a journalist who doesn’t understand what market share is
- estimator7292 1y agoEverybody else is telling you you're wrong and you're doubling down and insisting that respectable journals are morons who don't understand anything. You should stop, reflect on this fact for a moment, then go pick up a goddamn book
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- msgilligan 1y agoThere are multiple ways of calculating market share (e.g. units vs dollars or for different time periods) but assuming it is measured in dollars for a quarterly time period, how would you calculate the market share based upon my sample data above?
- oncallthrow 1y ago(company sales in period - company returns for sales made in said period) / (industry sales in period)
- matt_kantor 1y agoWith this formula market share for past periods can keep changing arbitrarily far into the future (depending on the companies' return policies).
- oncallthrow 1y agoYes.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]