"Cognitive Load" may be a buzzword, and not well defined, and that doesn't mean it isn't a useful concept for evaluating different approaches toward solving pro

"Cognitive Load" may be a buzzword, and not well defined, and that doesn't mean it isn't a useful concept for evaluating different approaches toward solving problems that may extend the useful life of that solution instead of reinventing yet another wheel. Getting to a better understanding of "cognitive load" does seem useful. Some things are "easier" to understand than others. Could things that are less efficient to understand be formulated in a way that is more efficient? I have a notion that "cognitive load" is related to the human's ability to gain and maintain attention to mentally ingesting a solution (along with the problem the solution putatively solves). Interesting reads for this include McGilchrist's Master and His Emissary, and Carolyn Dicey Jennings' "I attend, therefore I am," [0], who was interviewed on the Rutt podcast [1]. 0. https://aeon.co/essays/what-is-the-self-if-not-that-which-pays-attention https://aeon.co/essays/what-is-the-self-if-not-that-which-pa... 1. https://jimruttshow.blubrry.net/the-jim-rutt-show-transcripts/transcript-of-ep-276-carolyn-dicey-jennings-on-attention-and-mental-control/ https://jimruttshow.blubrry.net/the-jim-rutt-show-transcript...