3 ms·
FreeBSD is giving me a sultry look as I ponder my NAS build.
by NewJazz 1y ago
FreeBSD is giving me a sultry look as I ponder my NAS build.
- kstrauser 1y agoI'm in that boat. I'm looking over at that Synology unit sitting in the corner of my living room, knowing it'll be the last of its kind to live here, and wondering what its replacement will look like. FreeBSD's been good to me and it might be time to reintroduce myself to it.
- nichos 1y agoDoesn't TrueNAS (Linux version) come with ZFS?
- magicalhippo 1y agoTrueNAS Scale, which is the Linux variant, does indeed come with ZFS. The comapny behind it, iXsystems, pays for ZFS developers as well.
- _0xdd 1y agoGo for it. I made the switch ~10 years ago and didn't regret it at all. First-class, rock solid ZFS integration. Saved my data on more than one occasion.
- bpye 1y agoThere are some Linux distros with ZFS as a near first class citizen. NixOS is one, I believe Alpine is another.
- mrighele 1y agoUbuntu too.
- bombcar 1y agoI looked long and hard at FreeBSD and eventually went with Gentoo on ZFS, as I was familiar with Gentoo and ZFS wasn't hard to add.
- speed_spread 1y agoProxmox is Debian + ZFS. Works great.
- Gud 1y agoFreeBSD is extremely simple to keep up to date, including third party packages. Unless you have some very specific reason to use Linux, I would go with FreeBSD.
- procaryote 1y agoFwiw, I'm running a NAS on btrfs (on top of mdadm raid as I don't fully trust the btrfs raid, and the recovery tools seem worse). It seems to be working well so far. Being able to do snapshots easily is really nice. I have a script that makes hourly snapshots and keeps the N latest, which protects me against a bunch of pebkac errors I do periodic backups to non-btrfs storage though. I need backups anyway so it seemed like an easy way to de-risk