You and I are talking about totally different things. I'm talking about general overviews of topics, where a good book form at the level you're looking for oft

You and I are talking about totally different things. I'm talking about general overviews of topics, where a good book form at the level you're looking for often doesn't even exist. You're talking about a classic book that is recognized as a great work. Nobody's claiming that what ChatGPT outputs is Cosmos. And most books written by people aren't Cosmos either. And most of the time when you want a basic factual introduction to a field that is at your level, neither too popular nor too technical, ChatGPT is really good at providing that. Not everything has to be Cosmos.