4 ms·

This is the first web UI I've seen in years that isn't copypaste trash. Beautiful design and interaction elements here.

by joshcsimmons 1y ago

kevinqi 1y ago
really? it's pretty but I find it unreadable/unusable
- JimDabell 1y ago
  I gave up on trying it out because I found the UI to be genuinely awful.
- bogtog 1y ago
  Same here, I can't scroll smoothly at all even when I try (Windows mouse setting set to 15 lines per scroll tick)
- joshcsimmons 1y ago
  At least they tried something different.
  - LeafItAlone 1y ago
    I wish they hadn’t
jumploops 1y ago
Unfortunately the text rendering is terrible on my external monitor (looks ok on the MBP's retina screen).
ewoodrich 1y ago
It took 8 seconds to fully load and then the tab locked up on my (admittedly low-RAM ) Chromebook...
- joshcsimmons 1y ago
  > It took 8 seconds to fully load and then the tab locked up on my (admittedly low-RAM ) Chromebook... ...and I can't play Cyberpunk 2077 on my macbook. Outside of sales/utilities (money,healthcare,etc.) I don't know where this notion of "having to develop for low specced machines" game from for web.
  - ewoodrich 1y ago
    Well I'm not expecting to run the model, but being able to simply browse a website to learn about what they've released doesn't seem like a massive ask. I'm not talking about 512 megabytes here, it's a regular up-to-date supported device that can browse 99.99% of the modern web without any issues. It's pretty horrible performance even on my two year Windows laptop with 16GB of RAM, I could try on my M1 Macbook too but the juice just isn't worth the squeeze for me at this point.
    - joshcsimmons 1y ago
      Yeah I see that - definitely a divisive choice.
airstrike 1y ago
Came here looking for this comment. One of the most aesthetically pleasing things I've seen in a decade.
soared 1y ago
They mention they’re working on a mobile UI.. but man using the current UI on mobile is horrible.

This is the first web UI I've seen in years that isn't copypaste trash. Beautiful design and interaction elements here.

kevinqi 1y ago

really? it's pretty but I find it unreadable/unusable

JimDabell 1y ago
I gave up on trying it out because I found the UI to be genuinely awful.
bogtog 1y ago
Same here, I can't scroll smoothly at all even when I try (Windows mouse setting set to 15 lines per scroll tick)
joshcsimmons 1y ago
At least they tried something different.
- LeafItAlone 1y ago
  I wish they hadn’t

jumploops 1y ago

Unfortunately the text rendering is terrible on my external monitor (looks ok on the MBP's retina screen).

ewoodrich 1y ago

It took 8 seconds to fully load and then the tab locked up on my (admittedly low-RAM ) Chromebook...

joshcsimmons 1y ago
> It took 8 seconds to fully load and then the tab locked up on my (admittedly low-RAM ) Chromebook... ...and I can't play Cyberpunk 2077 on my macbook. Outside of sales/utilities (money,healthcare,etc.) I don't know where this notion of "having to develop for low specced machines" game from for web.
- ewoodrich 1y ago
  Well I'm not expecting to run the model, but being able to simply browse a website to learn about what they've released doesn't seem like a massive ask. I'm not talking about 512 megabytes here, it's a regular up-to-date supported device that can browse 99.99% of the modern web without any issues. It's pretty horrible performance even on my two year Windows laptop with 16GB of RAM, I could try on my M1 Macbook too but the juice just isn't worth the squeeze for me at this point.
  - joshcsimmons 1y ago
    Yeah I see that - definitely a divisive choice.

airstrike 1y ago

Came here looking for this comment. One of the most aesthetically pleasing things I've seen in a decade.

soared 1y ago

They mention they’re working on a mobile UI.. but man using the current UI on mobile is horrible.