3 ms·
> I think we now agree that if such incidents did occur, you acknowledge that charges could be pressed. Why worry about hypotheticals? Lol. I mean yeah, all v
by jijijijij 1y ago
> I think we now agree that if such incidents did occur, you acknowledge that charges could be pressed.
Why worry about hypotheticals? Lol.
I mean yeah, all very concerning, but you are shifting the narrative, moving the goalpost a lot, now. It's frustrating and doesn't paint you as someone interested in honest exploration of a topic. Quite frankly, that's the only point made clear.
- randomtoast 1y agoI mean, you can have your own opinion on whether I shift the narrative or move the goalpost, and that is fair enough. But if you scroll all the way up to my first comment I said: > In Germany, you are generally not allowed to film law enforcement. If someone feels they have been treated "unfairly", good luck to prove that in court when two officers present a completely different version of event ... And in my last comment about the matter I said: > Imagine your word against two or more officers. Who will the judges believe? Most likely the officers, unless you have very strong proof, such as video evidence. I hope my point is clearer now ... I would say this pretty much matches very well, YMMV