> It's straight dishonest to get hung up on some single incidences, which may, or may not have happened. I think we now agree that if such incidents did occur,

> It's straight dishonest to get hung up on some single incidences, which may, or may not have happened. I think we now agree that if such incidents did occur, you acknowledge that charges could be pressed. However, I may not have made my point clearly enough. My intention was not to highlight random YouTuber incidents, but to draw attention to misconduct by officials in the course of their duties and our restrictions/regulations. For example, just four days ago the headline read: "97 Bundeswehr soldiers dismissed for right-wing extremism." [1] We could argue that the Bundeswehr is not law enforcement, but there have been similar right-wing issues within police departments, where officers have shared extremist content. What I want to emphasize is that this is not about single incidents, but about a growing systemic issue of misconduct in law enforcement. And those who could provide the strongest proof of such misconduct - through video evidence - (journalists) are often prohibited from doing so. > Did those YouTubers press charges? Imagine your word against two or more officers. Who will the judges believe? Most likely the officers, unless you have very strong proof, such as video evidence. I hope my point is clearer now: this is not about isolated incidents, but about a broader systemic problem, fueled by the growing popularity of right-wing views within law enforcement and our harsh restrictions and regulations, which are strictest in the free world. It is the combination of both which is dangerous. [1]: https://www.tagesschau.de/investigativ/wdr/bundeswehr-rechtsextremismus-134.html https://www.tagesschau.de/investigativ/wdr/bundeswehr-rechts...