4 ms·
> An allowlist run by one company that site owners chose to engage with. Exactly, no problem with that, just hinting that's not a protocol. > But the irony of
by positiveblue 1y ago
> An allowlist run by one company that site owners chose to engage with.
Exactly, no problem with that, just hinting that's not a protocol.
> But the irony of taking an ideological stance about fairness while using AI generated comics for blog posts
Wait, what?
- avtar 1y ago> Wait, what? I was referring to the following image: https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!zRK-!,w_1250,h_703,c_fill,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep,g_center/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F508ed5ad-3ced-4ae4-a881-b062861defc3_1024x1024.png https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!zRK-!,w_1250,h_703,c...
- positiveblue 1y agoI know the image, what I do not understand is the argument between using it being incompatible with "fairness" and "openness"
- jaredcwhite 1y agoGenAI image generation is not fair. also: “Cloudelare” ;-P
- ryukoposting 1y agoI can't speak for the other commenter, but I think companies like Midjourney and OpenAI are robber barons exploiting people's creative work in ways that obviously aren't fair, but that our legal system wasn't equipped to prevent.