I have no issue with people sharing LLM generated tools if they actually work, even if they're 100% LLM generated and the poster has just validated that they wo

I have no issue with people sharing LLM generated tools if they actually work, even if they're 100% LLM generated and the poster has just validated that they work, but with just a quick glance I can see many issues with this that indicate you haven't tested it or even bothered to read the handful of words on the page: - The target file size option on the compression tab just changes the bitrate without any consideration for the length of the video. This is immediately visible if you either test the command, if you're aware of what bitrate is, or if you even bother to read the LLM generated code in which there's a comment that says "Assuming 60 second video". - The resolution options do not allow for anything other than 16:9, you can set one parameter to -1 (or -n for a multiple of n) to make it work with any aspect ratio. I can maybe see a person clumsily missing this one. - There is no such thing as a "wav" encoder in ffmpeg. This is again immediately obvious if you test the generated commands as ffmpeg will print an error message and not produce an output file. - Why does the command for "video compression" (which it isn't) in the FAQ not match the command generated by the tool?