4 ms·
I'm wondering if it's just because those foods happen to also be foods with low glycemic index [0]. Based on an NPR story I heard yesterday [1] (if correct), I
by ap22213 14y ago
I'm wondering if it's just because those foods happen to also be foods with low glycemic index [0].
Based on an NPR story I heard yesterday [1] (if correct), I'd guess that you'd get similar results eating any of those types of foods [2].
[0] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glycemic_index http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glycemic_index
[1] http://www.wbur.org/npr/160757730/low-and-slow-may-be-the-way-to-go-when-it-comes-to-dieting http://www.wbur.org/npr/160757730/low-and-slow-may-be-the-wa...
[2] http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/76/1/5/T1.expansion.html http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/76/1/5/T1.expansion.html
- jc4p 14y agoSome other reading on the factuality of the importance some people/diets are putting on the glycemic index: http://alanaragon.com/glycemic-index http://alanaragon.com/glycemic-index The conclusions part is pretty great.