4 ms·
If there's a known vulnerability (which is the case to the best of my knowledge) that can be exploited by an enemy to bring harm to American forces, that would
by CodeWriter23 1y ago
If there's a known vulnerability (which is the case to the best of my knowledge) that can be exploited by an enemy to bring harm to American forces, that would be the very nature of protected National Security Information.
- tracker1 1y agoYeah, you push someone over, their side arm might fire. Any such weakness on a side arm is not something widely or likely remotely exploitable.
- cosmicgadget 1y agoUnless you have an earthquake machine.
- kstrauser 1y agoI disagree, for the same reasons I support open vulnerability disclosures. Any other military could buy one of these pistols, analyze it, and put the vulnerability on Wikipedia or similar. These aren’t rare or hard to acquire.
- otterley 1y agoPerhaps so, but there is a difference between an enemy independently discovering a weakness and telling them what it is. The first is strategy, the second is treason.
- bigyabai 1y agoAnd when the OEM finds a vulnerability and withholds it, that's just "doing business" here in the states.
- tgsovlerkhgsel 1y agoThis is a weakness that can cause accidents, not some kind of remote exploit that would magically let an adversary make guns go off. The only "national security issue" is that it's embarrassing.
- stevemk14ebr 1y agoThis is pseudo-intelligence: "can be exploited by an enemy to bring harm to American forces" means nothing when talking about a metal gun. This isn't some computer vulnerable to RCEs or fly by wire bullets.
- tracker1 1y agoBut what if the "enemy" has AI bullets with recognition and target tracking for the P320, so they can reliably target the gun with a smart bullet in order to have their gun go off and shoot themselves in the leg or something? /sarcasm I'm with you... the idea that anything to do with a common side arm is worthy of "military secrets" protection is, as I said, absurd.
- monster_truck 1y agoI'll believe that when they take down the innumberable youtube videos demonstraiting it clearly
- martin-t 1y agoLike telekinesis? This comment is the perfect example of how saying something obviously wrong (or nonsensical) on the internet is the best way to get people to respond (of which I am now guilty myself). The (reasonable) GP comment has 1 reply and the (unreasonable) parent comment has 5 already.
- 11101010001100 1y agoBy this logic, it will be exploited even without disclosure.