I recall reading about a situation where a dude sued Evil Corp based largely on phone conversations he recorded. Evil Corp tried to argue the recorded conversat

I recall reading about a situation where a dude sued Evil Corp based largely on phone conversations he recorded. Evil Corp tried to argue the recorded conversations were illegal because their was no explicit consent and therefore couldn't be used in the lawsuit. However, the dude counter-argued that Evil Corp's own disclaimer clearly states the call can be recorded; it just never mentioned who's doing the recording. The judge agreed with the dude and the lawsuit proceeded. I can't remember, I think "Evil Corp" was his local cable company???