2 ms·
It's paywalled.
by claar 1y ago
It's paywalled.
- sjsdaiuasgdia 1y agohttps://archive.is/s1psp https://archive.is/s1psp
- ddtaylor 1y agoThe article is paywalled, but it also only calls the person "the hacker" and then says this: > The hacker, known online by his X handle @greentheonly, did not testify in the case. So, we have information that we cannot prove being given by a person who won't testify in court? How is this proper chain of evidence, etc.?