3 ms·
Both sides are at fault. Who is "more" at fault is a pointless debate. A good question however is, what to do with two warring parties that are both at fault i
by Incipient 1y ago
Both sides are at fault. Who is "more" at fault is a pointless debate.
A good question however is, what to do with two warring parties that are both at fault in different ways? ...and a question I have no valuable input on.
- bryanlarsen 1y agoThere are more than two sides, that's what's causing this cognitive dissonance. It's not pro-Palestine vs pro-Isreal, it's pro-Netanyahu and pro-Hamas. That makes it much easier to realize that people can & should be both anti-Netanyahu and anti-Hamas.
- nabla9 1y agoWe should not take sides for human rights violations. Both sides should be prosecuted and held responsible. Just like ICC is doing. Israel has violated the principle of proportionality and has more responsibilities as it is occupying state.