3 ms·
Stock mobile Chrome doesn't support extensions and doesn't have user agent manipulation capabilities unfortunately, so that's a no-go. My options are using cus
by perching_aix 1y ago
Stock mobile Chrome doesn't support extensions and doesn't have user agent manipulation capabilities unfortunately, so that's a no-go.
My options are using custom Chrome, migrating to Firefox, or proxying my traffic and making edits that way (e.g. doing the Anubis PoW there and injecting the cookie required).
Not stoked about any of these, although Firefox is a lot on my mind these days, and option #3 would be a good excuse to dust off my RPi.
- anonym29 1y agoFirefox's sandboxing still wasn't anywhere near as robust as Chrome's from a security perspective last time I checked, but fwiw, FF mobile has full FF extension support these days, including full-fat uBlock Origin. I refuse to be boiled slowly by Google. With MV3, it was full-fat ad blockers. With MV4 it could very well be ALL ad-blockers. And yeah, I concede that sounds conspiratorial - as conspiratorial as Google cracking down on your ability to run the ad-blocker of your choice would've sounded a decade ago.
- userbinator 1y agoIf you are doing JS whitelisting then in terms of security, you're already far ahead of everyone else who just has it on by default (and isn't blocking anything either.)