4 ms·

Agreed. The beauty of programming is that you're creating a "mathematical artifact." You can always drill down and figure out exactly what is going on and what

Agreed. The beauty of programming is that you're creating a "mathematical artifact." You can always drill down and figure out exactly what is going on and what is going to happen with a given set of inputs. Now with things like concurrency that's not exactly true, but, I think the sentiment still holds. The more practical question is though, does that matter? Maybe not.

DSingularity 1y ago
In a way this is also a mathematical artifact — after all tokens are selected through beam searching or some random sampling of likely successor tokens.
didericis 1y ago
> The more practical question is though, does that matter? I think it matters quite a lot. Specifically for knowledge preservation and education.
- bathtub365 1y ago
  Yep, LLM’s still run on hardware with the same fundamental architecture we’ve had for years, sitting under a standard operating system. The software is written in the same languages we’ve been using for a long time. Unless there’s some seismic shift where all of these layers go away we’ll be maintaining these systems for a while.
- beefnugs 1y ago
  Yes, but : not in all cases really. There are plenty of throw away, one off, experimental, trial and error, low stakes, spammy, interactions with dumb-assery, manager replacing instances that are acceptable as being quickly created and forgotten black boxes of temporary barely working trash. (not that people will limit to the proper uses)