4 ms·
The high speed rail comparison is a good example of how this view is as flawed as the idea that China makes cheap crap. China spent around a trillion dollars w
by m0llusk 1y ago
The high speed rail comparison is a good example of how this view is as flawed as the idea that China makes cheap crap. China spent around a trillion dollars worth of conjured financial assets on their high speed rail network. The result has some very positive qualities but also ongoing cost overruns, many incidents including quite a few deaths, and spotty service on routes that turned out to have inconsistent demand. Now the bills are coming due, revenues are way down, the country is in a large downturn, and the future is cloudy. We will see how things play out, but the idea that China has a great rail network only really stands if you ignore all the issues with debt, maintenance, and disappointing utilization.
- danny_codes 1y agoIf china went with cars like the US did instead of rail they’d have 10s of thousands of excess deaths a year.
- thombee 1y agoDoes public transport, which acts to serve the public, NEED to generate revenue? Of course its good if they do, but don't see it as a prerequisite. Idk about you, but I would rather have an excess of underutilised rail then the 0km of high speed rail that is in my country.