5 ms·
Does that include legal fights and potential payouts to artists and writers whose work was used without permission? Can anyone explain why it's not allowed to
by lawlessone 1y ago
Does that include legal fights and potential payouts to artists and writers whose work was used without permission?
Can anyone explain why it's not allowed to compensate the creators of the data?
- ergocoder 1y agoOf course not. Those usually wouldn't be considered "margin". Another similar example is R&D and development by engineers aren't considered in margin either.
- Night_Thastus 1y agoIt's already questionable if anyone can make it profitable once you account for all the costs. Why do you think they try to squash the legal concerns so hard? If they move fast and stick their fingers in their ears, they can just steal whatever the want.
- datavirtue 1y ago[flagged]
- lawlessone 1y agowhy not?
- eikenberry 1y agoObviously because you are now allowed to download and share copyrighted works without permission or cost. At least that seems to be the precedent being set in court cases thus far.
- tick_tock_tick 1y agoBecause the law as it stands says they aren't and Congress may make no ex post facto law.
- lawlessone 1y agook, but that's just one country.
- tick_tock_tick 1y agoI mean for AI literally the only countries involved are the USA and China. I doubt you think China is going to start respecting IP rights anytime soon.
- nl 1y agoMistral is in France.