no doubt you have seen cases where Side A has 10 examples of case law and Side B has 10 counterexamples of caselaw, but by simply omitting the context .. what j

no doubt you have seen cases where Side A has 10 examples of case law and Side B has 10 counterexamples of caselaw, but by simply omitting the context .. what jurisdiction, what burdens are placed upon the parties, what is at stake.. you make a sweeping generalization that is just false, for the sake of persuasion. Speaking authoritatively you have some responsibility to show context, otherwise this is blather IMHO