4 ms·
>> As for the rest--your other posts implicitly assume that everyone else shares your choices and priorities--and if not then they aren't relevant. >Wow, where
by 542354234235 1y ago
>> As for the rest--your other posts implicitly assume that everyone else shares your choices and priorities--and if not then they aren't relevant.
>Wow, where do you get that from?
I mean, right off the bat, you started with "If you are blind it cannot be worse" which is a pretty big assumption that being blind is so horrible and makes your life so worthless, that risking your life to reverse it seems like the obvious choice.
- BrandoElFollito 1y agoYes, I was not clear here (I clarified in another comment) - I meant if you are blind, you cannot get "blinder". There are other risks of course, which I addressed in the comments (basically, it is for an individual to decide whether they want to accept risks, also in the case where the risks are not quantifiable)