3 ms·
No doubt, it's a double-edged sword. And to be clear, I wouldn't have a problem if only the facts were put down: current methods, advantages (probably compared
by uticus 1y ago
No doubt, it's a double-edged sword.
And to be clear, I wouldn't have a problem if only the facts were put down: current methods, advantages (probably compared to other methods) and drawbacks. But to say this is "potentially offering a more sustainable alternative to fossil fuels" is like saying: "I can use a 74GW data center and a prompt to get the answer to 2+2, it potentially offers a more sustainable alternative to calculators."
- schmidtleonard 1y agoYou say that, but is it true? The science keeps walking away from the Searchinger 2008 result (100g GHG/MJ iLUC for corn ethanol) and towards the biofuels industry claims that this was absurdly high, yet green rhetoric still behaves like the argument was 100% settled in 2008 and anyone who thinks otherwise is a shill.