3 ms·
> On top of that, Scala provides several widely used ... With Scala is less what you miss, and more what you have. - Custom operators. Those are great for DSL
by Ygg2 1y ago
> On top of that, Scala provides several widely used ...
With Scala is less what you miss, and more what you have.
- Custom operators. Those are great for DSLs and rendering your code to look like utter gibberish, and confuse IDEs.
- SBT. Shudder.
- Scala 2 codebases.
- misja111 1y agoYour first 2 are good points. Your last point is of course not relevant when you're considering which language to pick for your new enterprise application. Anyways, IMO it would have been much more interesting and useful to compare Rust with Scala/Java/C#, whatever the outcome of the comparison would be.
- Ygg2 1y ago> Your last point is of course not relevant when you're considering which language to pick for your new enterprise application. Sure I might be writing a new app, but what if some dependency is Scala 2.12-? As for your latter point. I still think Rust would be more productive than all listed. I would expect Scala might give Rust the biggest run for its money. C# could probably be closest to Rust perf wise. Or not. Depends on the workload.