You’re unable to engage substantively, so you fall back on moral posturing and dismissal. The “dictator” framing also reveals your own unfalsifiable assumption

You’re unable to engage substantively, so you fall back on moral posturing and dismissal. The “dictator” framing also reveals your own unfalsifiable assumption - that Trump is inherently authoritarian regardless of policy outcomes or democratic processes. It’s the kind of tribal reasoning that makes genuine political discourse nearly impossible. Pretty much proves my point about ideological capture better than any argument could. So much for your “critical thinking”.