The same Picasso that was notorious for churning them out towards the end of his career? I'm being slightly flippant but I do think this is a motte and bailey

The same Picasso that was notorious for churning them out towards the end of his career? I'm being slightly flippant but I do think this is a motte and bailey argument. Not even painting is a Guernica nor does it need to be. And not every aesthetically pleasing object is art. (And finally - art doesn't even have to be aesthetically pleasing. And actually finally "art" has a multitude of contradictory meanings)