I think the ruling is that they are not required to, but it does not say they are forbidden to. Assuming their TOS says they reserve the right to share such in

I think the ruling is that they are not required to, but it does not say they are forbidden to. Assuming their TOS says they reserve the right to share such information in response to subpoenas / their whims, I'm not sure there would be much recourse unless there's some law forbidding this.